Tunisia, Egypt and now Libya.
are military, "aristocracy" oligarchic, senior State to face dangerous and lead uprisings and revolts. The origin of which, some say, there are also unresolved social problems, increased prices of basic foodstuffs, liberticide and oppression in any way anti-democratic power choices nepotistic and so on, surely there are concatenations Cases of this type, but there were (and are happening) especially furious power struggle between those in power was already there (military autocrats, dynasties, and even in the case of Libya, tribe).
Now the question is, however, but the "secret services" from around the world have long holidays and were all distracted? And political and diplomatic circles or those of the media, did not notice anything? Yet the outbreak is large and involves their interlocutors that "inexplicably and suddenly," you are killing. Then all they have not done their job? Or the "coup plotters" have done a comedy special, everyone, to mask their illnesses and their next step to action? Pathetic was the picture of the Libyan ambassador to the United Nations, which after being deployed against Gaddafi, has been embraced by all in tears and called for the punishment of those who had sent him, his "spiritual guide", Muammar Gaddafi, even He was surprised he did not know anything about the maneuvers of the Libyan tribes, of which he is part, for and against the power current. Given that
:
- Ben Ali, Tunisian deposed leader, made a coup when he was the general in charge of "intelligence" of Bourguiba;
- Mubarak, was in charge of "intelligence" of Egyptian President Sadat when he was murdered him and took his place;
- Libyan Gaddafi was a young officer, when deposed King Idris el Senussi, originally from Cyrenaica, and it was with a group of officers expression of the various regions and tribes of Libya, on behalf of a unified national so-called "Nasser"
- in these countries it seems that the power network remains the same, with the replacement of men, families and dynasties, perhaps with some opening in more libertarian, but without structural changes (on the other hand, the Arab and Islamic history has a continuity in the secular conception of what elsewhere called the State) ;
- the 'country Egypt is important for peace in the world;
- Tunisia is a country as important as reference Islamic secularism in Europe;
- Libya is important country in the world market for oil and gas.
In view of this, is it possible that behind the "secret services", generals, arms, heads dynasties, tribal leaders, people leaders, regents of the state, there is never was none? The leaders, from the "services" (Ben Ali and Mubarak) and the military coup (Gaddafi) acted alone, in short, improvised? And, since I lived alone, happily? And those who have done or are doing (do) the "revolutions" must act in complete isolation, only in the company of people, as if the military or oil were the "optional", a minor?
For example, stopping in Libya: the mythical greater Jallud has long been the head of the Gaddafi government (and therefore relationship and often friends with everyone) was abruptly killed off (it was said that he was conspiring against Gaddafi and stealing, course); Jallud is one of the leaders of the tribe Maghara, together with General Jaber Al Megrahi of the Lockerbie bombing, the tribe Maghara seems aligned against Qadhafi, and no one knew, knew, had relationships with Maghara, which have the power network in the most important Libyan armed forces (not by chance seem to have melted like snow in the sun to the early lifting Cyrenaica)? And no one knew the Azaweya, which now threatened to close the oil spigot? Or the Warfalla, which have a population equal to 20% of the Libyans?
It 'hard to think that all the pandemonium that is happening in North Africa is random, so if the world should tremble and we hope that it is not someone in the world to know what's going on in those countries, in many ways vital for everyone.
Posted by "Western" February 28, 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment