am against, the former Italian Communists, which are not few, if there are no grandparents, there are fathers and children, and children's children. Devised between 90 and 94 a system that would take them directly to the Government, by court removed the parliamentary majority. They changed the name, usurped the ideas of socialists and social democrats, long after they mocked and then imprisoned, and began the joyous war machine. We are talking about a force that was worth at that time about one third of the electorate Italian. Having done away with parties that had about 50% of the electoral consensus, they faced a highway for the coveted seats and chairs, including folding. The horrible Berlusconi prevented them. They tried to make a judicial incli also to eliminate him (the author of this incli course is no longer a judge, but sits with them in Parliament ), But failed. The most Machiavellian of their group (which also goes for being the most intelligent, without ever having shown) even tried, under the table, to find, with this strange and sudden Berlusconi, any agreement, without success. So now they are all united against him, he first person, even politics. To "save" Italy must reduce him, Berlusconi after cinghialone Craxi, here's the Dirty Berlusconi.
am against those that appear as the fundamentalist Catholics. They were the first republic called "Democratic Left", then only took care of chairs, their policies were only stunts records: most times even incomprehensible. But the communists in 1990, to launch their coup, they needed someone, not theirs, that accompany them, in DC took home the "left", which moreover had the advantage of the name. These fundamentalists have followed and also cross-promoted all anti-Berlusconi. They lack only the cry "Burn" then a new war ethical obscurantism could easily be started, with their "Pauline", moreover, there have been ... neighbors. Berlusconi, a manifest sinner and enriched arrogant, seems made for the stake.
am against, the bustle of the "left" ; In many Western countries are the purest, most abstract and even more profits to their opponents. This lively, popular-often from the lexicon or provocative or even completely and perhaps deliberately incomprehensible (to cover proposals and ideas that are not there or are equal to those of others), swing their importance in an electoral area has always been them, the protesters, with implications anarchist "revolutionary".
am against, the justice-and those who fly with the robes of handcuffs and made their fortune, took part in the coup, many of them they were the architects, they also hoped to have much more substantial than rewards had, in terms of power, armchairs and garege; their proposed policy is simple, respect for the law, and particularly the Judiciary, which is infallible. Through the judiciary have a network of relationships. They built a Berlusconi outlaw, and live on this, try to also deal with the rest, but not even believe it too.
am against those who call themselves "core" (center compared to what, in which opposing ideas?) They would only have the place of the enemy Berlusconi, perhaps with his votes, or return to a proportional electoral system, to try to be even a few votes, the balance, among them are former Christian Democrats, former MSI, co-authors of the coup of 90-94 with the ex-communists, and various opportunists who hope to always be decisive.
am against, the salons of the 'intelligentsia', as the diversity elite (artistic, literary, mass-media, professional and "neo-entrepreneurial") that Plato would have called the salons of the "aristocracy" modern "; ago to "be against a Bausch, who presents himself as a populist Wasteland (and perhaps it is also, in every way it reads to perfection), as a man affected by education, learned, as a violator of the bon ton, joyful and irreverent; like a scrooge accustomed to its castles and its rules, not prone to the climate of living of others, so-called "chic", which is a lot of hypocrisy and lack of real detail.
against
Finally, those who make profession of "the antiberlusconismo" is a job that pays off and that has many adherents, does not require training or knowledge, or projects, or proposals, and requires only information about the enemy and large ability to insult, provocation, promotion and management of the brawl. These are usually people with Berlusconi won the lottery, their cries against Berlusconi, have been and are among the most effective for its strengthening; and maybe they know it too, but tend mainly to their profession and therefore also in their own pockets.
All these are the "obvious against, with always the same arguments, most of the time screaming and then there are" against "silent", which does not espouse the views of any of the obvious, but against Berlusconi.
All of this applies to the pollsters caravanserai not more than 45% of Italian voters, will not it?
0 comments:
Post a Comment