Today February 10, 2011, the French judges are "strike," oohp! not to "abstain from hearing" because it seems that the strike is not possible for them, and then does the vernacular. This abstention is already lasted several days and seemed disposed to take even more. Matter of the litigation? Presto said.
On 19 January, disappeared from Pornic, Laetitia, a beautiful eighteen year old girl and solar energy, given in trust to a family and a waitress in a bar. He was arrested, with all the evidence is conclusive, a pluripregiudicato, who had made thirteen years in prison for crimes similar and was out under judicial supervision: he was released from prison about a year before, had been denounced by his own family, for violence, not once but seven times, and had been issued against a request summons for the theft of a car. No, he had always been left free to do what he wanted. And so it seems that the "secured for Reintegration wanted to massacre the poor Laetitia, also cutting it into pieces, some of which were found in a pond a few days ago. These are the facts.
On 3 February, the President Sarkozy said: "When you get out of jail a person as the alleged perpetrator, without ensuring which is followed by a "mentor to Reintegration, you make a mistake. Those who have covered or made this mistake will be punished. "
uproar: the first prosecutor in Nantes, Pornic on the relevant area, and then all the prosecution and then the judges and then the senior judges, and then throughout the judiciary have closed like a clam to defend any court of crimes against Pornic Sarkozy's words and intentions, of course, the shot is moved, the judges make mistakes or fail because of the lack of "resources" ("'Vain' tell Livorno), and then strike against the government (always" thief "), is not responsible for the tragedy Laetitia.
Even in France has opened the abyss of questions, which are summarized into one: there were errors of magistrates or police officers in Pornic? That is, the tragedy could be avoided by Laetitia? That is, the judge who is wrong is responsible for his mistake? And if so, who decides whether or not he was wrong, just as serene look to the decisions of caste in self-management? Not only that specific event on the French magistrates introduce a further element of doubt atrocious, if not born of their need for self-defense: they say that in all cases at least 5% of offenders commit more crimes, they are sick and the company must take note; ie, monitoring or not, they will continue to commit a crime. In short, the judges declare that a few hundred sexual predators, repeat offenders known and are ready to kill, now, now (plus a few thousand less well-known), and the state can not do anything. Beautiful view to the civilized France, in the civilized Europe! In fact, things WOULD BE so if everyone did their duty, prosecutors and judicial police, the crime of Pornic on the shortcomings were huge, and a great cloud of dust behind celarle guild (apparently they're moving in the same way for the cops ) does not seem the best solution. At the bar the other night said, "... they want more money and staff; well divide their wages for two and doubling the workforce, much of "'Vain' (des sous) it would take too many ...." Not so, of course, but perhaps these corporations should be a little 'bow their heads before the people and democracy, "Republican", as they say in France. They can not forget that their job is done "in the name of the people." Even if the political people, in polls, Sarkozy is now giving wrong for 65% (in fact, his overall rating is also much lower than this 35%, that is)! A bit 'to sessantottino French magistrates have put behind the clerks, clerks and messengers of the judiciary; Commissioners and employees of police lawyers, teachers and, of course, but still lacking a bit 'of students.
As can be seen around the world over. The management of justice and especially the professional responsibilities of the courts remained open to all democracies in the world. There are no easy solutions, but it is also impossible that people can entrust their freedoms and their judicial systems to caste of "untouchables", one of the fundamental pillars of the rule of law is collapsing.
publlico from "the 'West' Feb. 10, 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment